![]() ![]() Netflix, one of the biggest streamers, came out against the FCC plan. Those sites that offer a lot of streaming are steaming over the possibility that internet service providers, known as ISPs, would charge them extra to use a “fast lane” to assure rapid delivery of their content to the intended users. One feature of the new FCC policy is that it allows for paid prioritization. “Apart from that,” Sister Campbell added wryly, “I don’t have any feelings on the subject.” For us to have those free speech rights superseded by somebody who’s got wealth and ownership, that means the Constitution’s really up for sale. We have significant access through the internet, as well as social media. And quite frankly, for us here at Network, we depend on the internet to communicate with our members. She echoed a point raised by Bishop Coyne: “Being serious about freedom of speech, then, means that speech should not be controlled by the ones who own a service or by how much money you can pay to get preference. “Now the internet is the public domain about where conversation takes place.” “When I was in law school and there were free speech suits about shopping malls being the new public square, the court acknowledged it and gave rights, even though they’re privately owned,” she added. It’s the new commons,” said Sister Campbell, a Sister of Social Service. “Net neutrality is essential for the exercise for free speech. “Strong net neutrality protections are critical to the faith community to function and connect with our members, essential to protect and enhance the ability of vulnerable communities to use advanced technology, and necessary for any organization that seeks to organize, advocate for justice or bear witness in the crowded and over-commercialized media environment,” he said.Īnother Catholic voice advocating for net neutrality - the principle that all lawful internet traffic is treated equally - is Sister Simone Campbell, executive director of Network, the Catholic social justice lobby. ![]() bishops’ Committee on Communications, detailed his desire for an open internet in a Nov. Coyne of Burlington, Vermont, chairman of the U.S. (CNS photo/Don Blake, The Dialog)īishop Christopher J. It’s the new commons,” said Sister Simone Campbell, executive director of Network, the Catholic social justice lobby. There was also the small matter of Pai, prior to taking the FCC chairmanship, having been a lawyer for Verizon, which, along with Comcast and AT&T, is one of the three big internet service providers which could reap a huge windfall from the rules changes.Ī woman chats with her husband overseas via the internet. The FCC refused requests to release computer data that could have shown the source of these disputed filings.Īnd, later in January, once the new rules go into effect, look for lawsuits, hearings and bills to reverse the FCC’s new policy. Thousands more, all of whom said they favor net neutrality, complained that their names had been pillaged and affixed to comments filed beforehand with the FCC that instead stated their support for a change in the rules. Hundreds of protesters turned out in front of the Washington office building that houses the FCC the day of the meeting to condemn the impending vote. That was far from the case, though, both before, during and after the 3-2 FCC vote along party lines to change the rules. 14 vote to rewrite the rules should have seemed anticlimactic. WASHINGTON (CNS) - After new Federal Communications Committee chair Ajit Pai announced his intentions in April to redo federal policy on net neutrality, the Dec.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |